AI VISIBILITY · MARKETING TEAMS

AI Visibility for Marketing Teams: make AI search a channel you can report

Share of voice, sentiment, and AI-driven demand in one view, measured the way you'd defend it to a CFO.

The shift

Buyers now ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI before they ever type a keyword into a search box. The journey that used to start with ten blue links now starts with one synthesized answer, and your analytics stack records the aftermath as direct traffic, dark social, or nothing at all. Pipeline is being shaped in a channel your dashboards don't show.

That's a reporting problem before it's a growth problem. SEO has rankings. Paid has ROAS. The AI channel has had anecdotes. A CMO who can't put AI visibility in a column next to those two can't budget for it, can't staff it, and can't take credit when it works.

What you see

The dashboard, in your category's terms

Visibilityyour share of voice across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot, benchmarked against the competitors your board actually asks about.
Brand Pulsehow the engines describe you: sentiment, positioning, and the claims they repeat.
GSC integrationbranded search demand on the same clock as AI exposure, property-level, no query-by-page double counting.
Agent PulseAI-crawler and agent traffic on your own site, so the “dark” part of the channel gets a line in the report.
A weekly storyyou can paste into the marketing review: what moved, on which engine, and what shipped that week to cause it.
What we fix

Shipped with your team, verified live

We don't hand you a dashboard and a goodbye. When monitoring shows an engine ignoring your pricing page or repeating a stale positioning line, we ship the fix with your team, schema, llms.txt, content rewrites, crawler policy, and verify it with a live audit before it counts. Newton School, BytePe and PropChk all have dated, client-confirmed deployments behind their numbers.

+235%BRANDED CLICKS, 6 → 19/WK
r = 0.85ORGANIC ↔ BRANDED DEMAND
−14%CONTROL BRAND, SAME WINDOW
r = 0.04PLACEBO CORRELATION

How we measure

Consistent measurement windows, normalized per monitored day, never cherry-picked dates.
Control brands and placebo checks separate campaign effect from the rising AI-search tide.
Every fix is verified live on production by independent audit before we count it.

The proof behind this page

We ran the playbook on our own six-week-old domain, against a control brand. Branded clicks went from 6 to 19 per week (+235%), branded impressions rose 31%, and organic sessions grew from 3.5 to 11.5 a day (+231%) while the control brand's branded clicks fell 14% over the same window. Organic sessions track branded demand at r = 0.85; the placebo check, direct traffic, which shouldn't correlate, comes in at r = 0.04. The lift is signal, not tide.

See it on your own prompts.

Book a demo and we run your category's questions live: what the engines say about you today, and what we'd fix first.