AI VISIBILITY · FINTECH & FINANCIAL SERVICES

AI Visibility for Fintech: when AI misquotes your fees, it's not a marketing problem

In a trust-critical category, what the engines say about your rates, charges and compliance status has to be accurate before it gets to be flattering.

The shift

Customers ask assistants “is this app safe,” “what does it charge for international transfers,” “is it actually regulated.” Engines answer with full confidence whether or not they're right, a hallucinated fee table or an outdated compliance claim reads exactly as authoritative as the truth. In a YMYL category, that's not a missed impression. It's risk surfacing in a channel nobody in the company owns.

Engines also hold financial content to stricter scrutiny than most categories. Accuracy, authority signals and structured facts decide whether they cite you directly, or cite a generic aggregator's secondhand summary of you.

What you see

The dashboard, in your category's terms

Brand Studio / Brand Digestyour rates, terms and compliance facts published as the authoritative record: the page you want every engine to learn from.
Engine Insightswhat each engine says about you, side by side, so a wrong answer is caught per engine instead of hiding in an average.
Sentiment monitoringthe trust language in your answers (“safe,” “regulated,” “hidden charges”), tracked daily.
Prompt Pulsethe trust prompts your prospects actually ask, monitored before a wrong answer hardens into consensus.
What we fix

Shipped with your team, verified live

We ship corrections, not just alerts: authoritative fact pages, schema, an llms.txt that states what's true, structured FAQ for the exact questions engines fumble, each one verified live before it counts. For a compliance-bound brand, the verification trail matters as much as the fix.

r = 0.85ORGANIC ↔ BRANDED DEMAND
r = 0.04PLACEBO CHECK HELD
−14%CONTROL BRAND, SAME WINDOW

How we measure

Consistent measurement windows, normalized per monitored day, never cherry-picked dates.
Control brands and placebo checks separate campaign effect from the rising AI-search tide.
Every fix is verified live on production by independent audit before we count it.

The proof behind this page

Our evidence standard is the product. When we measured our own program, we ran it against a control brand and published the placebo test: organic sessions track branded demand at r = 0.85, while direct traffic, which shouldn't correlate, comes in at r = 0.04. The control brand's branded clicks declined 14% over the same window, so the lift isn't the rising tide. In a category where overclaiming is a liability, you want a vendor whose numbers survive the hard question.

See it on your own prompts.

Book a demo and we run your category's questions live: what the engines say about you today, and what we'd fix first.