AIRPULSE VS PROFOUND · COMPARISON · JUNE 2026

AirPulse vs Profound: which AI visibility platform fits you?

Profound is the best-funded company in this category, and it earned that position. The real question is whether you need enterprise software to operate, or outcomes shipped with you.

Pick Profound when…

✓You're a Fortune 500 brand or large agency with enterprise budget, reported pricing runs into the thousands per month (as of June 2026).
✓You want self-serve software your own team operates: monitoring, prompt volumes, agent analytics and AEO workflows in one suite.
✓You need the widest engine list, including Grok, Meta AI and DeepSeek on Enterprise.

Pick AirPulse when…

✓You're mid-market and want fixes shipped, not another dashboard to staff.
✓You want remediation done with you and verified by live re-audits, not workflows you run alone.
✓You want a vendor that publishes its evidence standard: control groups, consistent windows, no overclaiming.
Side by side

AirPulse and Profound, feature by feature

ProfoundAirPulse
Engines monitored9 incl. Grok, Meta AI, DeepSeek; full coverage on Enterprise tierChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot
Monitoring depthAnswer Engine Insights: SOV, citations, sentiment; Conversation Explorer prompt volumesDaily prompt runs: citation sightings, source mix, sentiment, category rank
Crawler / agent analyticsYes: Agent Analytics (the closest rival to Agent Pulse)Agent Pulse: crawler & agent log analytics, tied to remediation
Content executionAgents/Workflows, autonomous AEO content, operated by your teamContent Pulse: schema-aware authoring
Done-with-you remediationNo: software only; your team runs the workflowsYes: done with you, verified by live re-audits on production
GSC / analytics integrationNo public traffic/revenue attribution; API is Enterprise-onlyGSC integration; control-brand analysis on your own analytics
Evidence standardEnterprise case studies (e.g., Ramp); 700+ enterprisesPublished methodology: control groups, consistent windows, live-verified audits
Pricing transparencySales-led, no self-serve trial; third-party trackers report ~$499 to $2,000–$5,000+/mo (as of June 2026)Engagement-based, scoped with you up front
Best fitFortune 500 + agenciesMid-market B2B that wants fixes shipped
What actually separates us

The differences that survive a demo call

Both measure. Only one ships fixes with you.

Profound's Agents and Workflows can draft and publish AEO content, but they're tools your team configures and runs. AirPulse works the other way: our team ships the remediation with yours, rendering fixes, schema, sitemaps, llms.txt, and every change is re-audited live on production before we count it. If you have a content-ops team waiting for software, Profound's model fits. If you want the work done and proven, that's our model.

Agent analytics: a genuine head-to-head

Credit where due: Profound's Agent Analytics is the closest thing in the market to Agent Pulse, and reviewers treat it as a strength. The difference is what happens next. AirPulse ties crawler and agent log data directly to the remediation queue, when GPTBot stops fetching a section, that becomes a task, a fix, and a re-audit, not a chart.

The cost of the full suite

Profound publishes no pricing; third-party trackers (as of June 2026) report tiers from roughly $499/month up to $2,000–$5,000+/month for Enterprise, and sources disagree on what the lower tiers include, so treat those figures as reported, not quoted. One analysis put Profound around 48% above the category's average price. Full engine coverage and API access sit at the Enterprise tier. For a Fortune 500 budget that's defensible; for mid-market teams it usually isn't the first dollar to spend.

Proof

Numbers with dates on them

✓Newton School: Google AI mention rate 51.4% → 93.3% (May 20–25 vs Jun 8–10 full-run windows), category #1 in every single run.
✓Airmeet: webinar citation rank #4 → #3, passing YouTube, with citation share up 35% in three weeks across 108,000+ tracked sightings.
✓AirPulse on itself: branded clicks +235% while a control brand declined 14% over the same window. We ran the placebo test on our own numbers.
FAQ

Questions teams ask on this comparison

By funding and scale, yes. Profound raised a $96M Series C at a $1B valuation in February 2026 (more than $155M total) and reports 700+ enterprise customers, including more than 10% of the Fortune 500. Customers include Ramp, US Bank, Indeed, MongoDB, DocuSign and Chime.

Profound doesn't publish pricing and there's no self-serve trial. Third-party sources (as of June 2026) report plans from about $499/month to $2,000–$5,000+/month at Enterprise; the exact composition of lower tiers conflicts between sources.

AirPulse monitors ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot. Profound's Enterprise tier covers more engines, including Grok, Meta AI and DeepSeek. If those long-tail engines matter to your buyers today, that's a real point in Profound's favor.

AirPulse doesn't stop at recommendations. We ship the fixes with your team, rendering, schema, sitemaps, crawler policy, and re-audit the live site before any score is published. BytePe went from GEO readiness 15 to 71 in under four weeks this way, with every change verified on production.

Yes. Some teams keep an enterprise monitoring suite and bring in AirPulse for the execution layer. Monitoring tells you what AI engines say; the remediation loop changes it.

← All comparisons

Want the fixes shipped, not just charted?

A walkthrough on your own brand's prompts, run by the team that builds the product.