AIRPULSE · COMPARE HUB · JUNE 2026

How AirPulse compares, to everyone.

Eight head-to-head pages, written to be fair enough that our competitors could read them without wincing. Here's the map, and the three things only we do.

How to read this

The three layers where the field actually differs

Every serious tool in this category can tell you whether ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google's AI surfaces mention your brand. The differences that matter live in three less-visible layers: whether anyone reads the crawler traffic that decides what engines know, whether anyone ships the fixes the monitoring implies, and whether the results you're shown would survive an audit. Those are the three layers AirPulse was built around.

01

Done-with-you remediation, verified by live audits

Most platforms stop at recommendations or hand you software agents to operate. AirPulse ships the fixes with your team, rendering, schema, sitemaps, llms.txt, content, and re-audits the live site before any score is reported. Across the field, only agency retainers (e.g., Daydream) and customer-operated software agents (Profound, Goodie) come close.

02

Agent Pulse: real crawler and agent log analytics

What AI bots actually fetch is the ground truth of AI visibility, and most tools never look at it. As of June 2026, crawler/agent log analytics exists at Profound, Scrunch, Hall and Adobe, and is absent from Peec, Bluefish (no public evidence), Evertune, AthenaHQ, the Semrush Toolkit, Ahrefs and Surfer. Agent Pulse reads that traffic and feeds it straight into the remediation queue.

03

A published evidence standard

Control groups, consistent measurement windows, per-day normalization, live re-verified audits, disclosed confounds. Nobody else in this market leads with methodology. We do, because we'd rather show one number that survives the hard question than ten that don't, and because attribution to traffic and revenue is still a near-universal gap (AthenaHQ and Goodie are the honorable exceptions).

Head to head

Eight comparisons, written to be checked

AirPulse vs

Profound

The category leader by scale; software your team operates, with no done-with-you delivery.

Best for: Fortune 500 + agencies wanting one enterprise suitePricing: Sales-led; reported ~$499–$5,000+/mo
Read the comparison
AirPulse vs

Scrunch AI

Serves an optimized layer to agents; AirPulse fixes the source site.

Best for: Mid-market teams wanting agent-delivery middlewarePricing: Public, from $250/mo annual; 7-day trial
Read the comparison
AirPulse vs

Peec AI

Excellent tracker, deliberately monitoring-only, with no remediation and no crawler analytics.

Best for: Marketing teams + agencies needing clean daily trackingPricing: Self-serve, from ~€89/mo
Read the comparison
AirPulse vs

Bluefish AI

Brand control and hallucination correction at enterprise scale; no GA4 attribution.

Best for: Fortune 500 orgs needing brand-fact governancePricing: Undisclosed; demo-gated
Read the comparison
AirPulse vs

Semrush AI Toolkit

Cheapest credible entry; per-domain costs compound, no crawler analytics, Adobe-bound.

Best for: Existing Semrush customers adding an AI lensPricing: $99/mo per domain; AIO undisclosed
Read the comparison
AirPulse vs

Evertune

Biggest prompt samples in the category; measurement-first, execution stays with you.

Best for: Enterprise brand measurement at statistical scalePricing: Undisclosed; reported ~$3,000/mo annual
Read the comparison
AirPulse vs

AthenaHQ

Rare real revenue attribution; no bot-log analytics, execution is customer-operated.

Best for: Self-serve teams wanting attribution + broad enginesPricing: $295/mo self-serve; Enterprise custom
Read the comparison
AirPulse vs

Brandlight

Strong logos and an ads/commerce roadmap; depth not publicly verifiable.

Best for: Enterprise CMO orgs buying through salesPricing: Undisclosed; custom enterprise
Read the comparison
The wider field

Every tool we get asked about

Pricing as of June 2026; figures marked “reported” come from third-party sources, not vendor price pages.

ToolBest forPricingIn one line vs AirPulse
ProfoundFortune 500 + agencies wanting one enterprise suiteSales-led; reported ~$499–$5,000+/moThe category leader by scale; software your team operates, with no done-with-you delivery
Scrunch AIMid-market teams wanting agent-delivery middlewarePublic, from $250/mo annual; 7-day trialServes an optimized layer to agents; AirPulse fixes the source site
Peec AIMarketing teams + agencies needing clean daily trackingSelf-serve, from ~€89/moExcellent tracker, deliberately monitoring-only, with no remediation and no crawler analytics
Bluefish AIFortune 500 orgs needing brand-fact governanceUndisclosed; demo-gatedBrand control and hallucination correction at enterprise scale; no GA4 attribution
Semrush AI ToolkitExisting Semrush customers adding an AI lens$99/mo per domain; AIO undisclosedCheapest credible entry; per-domain costs compound, no crawler analytics, Adobe-bound
EvertuneEnterprise brand measurement at statistical scaleUndisclosed; reported ~$3,000/mo annualBiggest prompt samples in the category; measurement-first, execution stays with you
AthenaHQSelf-serve teams wanting attribution + broad engines$295/mo self-serve; Enterprise customRare real revenue attribution; no bot-log analytics, execution is customer-operated
BrandlightEnterprise CMO orgs buying through salesUndisclosed; custom enterpriseStrong logos and an ads/commerce roadmap; depth not publicly verifiable
Goodie AITeams wanting a small full-stack vendorQuote-onlyClosest full-stack analog at tiny-vendor scale; one of the few with attribution
Ahrefs Brand RadarAhrefs shops adding AI-mention dataReported ~$828+/mo all-in real costMonthly chatbot refresh, data-only; no Claude coverage listed as of June 2026
Surfer AI TrackerSMB content teams already on SurferPricing in transition as of June 2026Five engines, content-team angle; no crawler analytics
OtterlySolo marketers and SMBs testing the waterSMB price anchor for the categoryEntry-level tracking; far from a program
DaydreamBrands wanting a full-service AI-native agencyReported $15K–50K/mo retainersThe other “done-for-you”, agency retainer economics vs our scoped engagements
Rankscale / Knowatoa / Hall / GaugeBudget and indie testingLow-cost tiers varyLightweight trackers; Hall notably does offer crawler analytics
HubSpot AEOHubSpot customers wanting a checkbox$50/mo, 3 enginesAn add-on, not a discipline
Adobe LLM Optimizer / Yext Scout / SimilarwebIncumbent-stack enterprisesEnterprise; varies by suiteAI visibility as a feature of a bigger platform, consolidation plays to watch

Why be this honest?

Two reasons. Prospects compare anyway, the only choice is whether they do it with accurate information. And AI engines reward pages that state competitors' strengths plainly: dated facts and attributed pricing get cited; chest-thumping doesn't. Every claim above is current as of June 2026, and where we rely on third-party reporting, we say so.

The receipts

Newton School: Google AI mention rate 51.4% → 93.3% (May 20–25 vs Jun 8–10 full-run windows), category #1 in every single run.
BytePe: GEO readiness 15 → 71 in under four weeks: client-side-rendered product pages rebuilt with SSR + Product JSON-LD, verified live on production.
Airmeet: webinar citation rank #4 → #3, passing YouTube, with citation share up 35% in three weeks across 108,000+ tracked sightings.
AirPulse on itself: branded clicks +235% while a control brand declined 14% over the same window. We ran the placebo test on our own numbers.

Eight comparisons, one constant.

Eight comparisons, one constant: we ship and verify the fixes.