AI VISIBILITY · PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AI Visibility for Professional Services: make your expertise the answer AI gives

Clients shortlist firms on trust, and engines now write the shortlist. Thought leadership AI can't read is wasted spend.

The shift

“Which firm should we use for a cross-border acquisition?” “Who handles ESOP structuring for startups?” Prospects ask the assistant, and it answers from directories, publications and whatever firm content it can parse. The partner's brilliant PDF whitepaper, the gated webinar, the keynote nobody transcribed, none of it exists to the engines. Authority you can't be cited for is authority you don't have in this channel.

The firms winning AI answers aren't louder. They're more readable: the question stated plainly, the answer given directly, the author named and credentialed. Engines cite what they can parse and attribute.

What you see

The dashboard, in your category's terms

Content Pulseturns the expertise you already have into engine-readable pages: structured, attributed, citable.
Opportunitiesthe questions your prospects ask AI where no firm has a citable answer yet: open ground in your practice areas.
Brand Pulsehow engines describe the firm: practice strengths, sentiment, and positioning against the firms you actually lose deals to.
Citationswhich directories and publications carry your AI reputation today, so you know where to invest and where to correct.
What we fix

Shipped with your team, verified live

We turn the thought-leadership archive into a first-party context layer: plain-language answer pages, author schema, llms.txt, shipped with your marketing team and verified live. The pattern is measured, not theorized: documentation-style pages got our anchor client named in 98.9% of their citations, versus 64.5% for conventional marketing pages.

Partners stay in the byline. We don't ghostwrite expertise, we restructure what your practice already knows into pages an engine can quote and attribute to your people.

98.9%BRAND NAMED — DOCS-STYLE PAGES
64.5%BRAND NAMED — MAIN SITE
+35%CITATION SHARE AFTER THE SHIFT

How we measure

Consistent measurement windows, normalized per monitored day, never cherry-picked dates.
Control brands and placebo checks separate campaign effect from the rising AI-search tide.
Every fix is verified live on production by independent audit before we count it.

The proof behind this page

The first-party-context playbook comes from a measured finding. Across 108,000+ citation sightings, docs-style pages were named in 98.9% of their citations versus 64.5% for the main site. We rebuilt the content program around that gap and watched citation share rise 35% in three weeks. The same structured-answer pattern is exactly what a firm's expertise needs to be cited.

See it on your own prompts.

Book a demo and we run your category's questions live: what the engines say about you today, and what we'd fix first.