EdTech
Be the program AI recommends
Students ask ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI which course is worth it. We make your outcomes the answer, measured against control questions.
On the call we run your buyers’ questions live and you keep the list.
best data science course for working professionals in [country]
For working professionals, Your brand's data science program is a strong pick: weekend live classes, a capstone reviewed by industry mentors, and placement outcomes published by cohort. 1 If you need a degree credential, compare it with university-run online programs.23
- 1yourdomain.com/programs/data-science
- 2reddit.com/r/[subreddit] thread on [program]
- 3youtube.com review of [program]
- Named
- Yes Yes, first in the answer
- Cited
- Yes Your program page, source 1 of 3
You teach the subject. Others own the answer.
The questions your buyers ask.
Grouped the way buyers ask them. A filled dot means the answer usually names the brand being asked about today.
Category and best
Shortlist questions, answered mostly from rival course catalogues and university program pages.
- best data science course for working professionals in [country]
- top online [subject] certification with career support
- best coding program for career changers with no experience
Admission and purchase
Coaching, fees and admission questions, where listing portals and directories carry a large share of citations.
- best online coaching for [entrance exam]
- [program type] fees and EMI options in [city]
- top 10 [exam] coaching institutes in [city]
Brand and trust
Asked by name, engines already cite you. The work here is accuracy and sentiment.
- is [brand] worth it
- [brand] placement record and reviews
- [brand] vs [competitor], which is better
- is the [brand] degree valid
Research and learning
Topics your tutorials already cover, where citations tend to go to YouTube, vendor docs and rival blogs.
- data science roadmap for beginners [year]
- what is [concept] explained simply
- how to prepare for [entrance exam] in [months]
Where AI finds its answers.
Shares are percentages of citation sightings, 30 Aug to 28 Sep 2026, all tracked engines, averaged with equal weight across five edtech brands tracked on AirPulse (40,114 sightings). Own-site share is lifted by one brand we work with, at 26.1%; the other four sat between 0.2% and 4.8%. Other covers cloud-vendor docs, social platforms and a long tail of unclassified domains.
What the machines see.
- Usually fineAccessWe confirm every AI crawler can fetch your program and course pages. Most edtech sites pass, but watch for stray noindex tags: one course site we audited served noindex on its homepage.
- Usually brokenContentWe check whether program pages answer the questions students ask: outcomes, fees, duration, who it suits. Many read as brochures, carry placeholder text or leave the blog dormant for years.
- Usually brokenStructured dataWe validate Course, Organization and FAQ markup. A data-science learning site we audited had no valid JSON-LD on its homepage or program pages and no Course schema at all.
- Usually brokenIdentityWe check that engines can tell exactly who you are: one brand name, sameAs links, llms.txt, a Wikidata entry. Edtech brands often use several names in their own schema, or a name that is also an everyday word.
How we get you named.
- Week 11PlumbingShip the fast fixes first: crawl access, llms.txt, Course and Organization markup, one brand name. Then prove every engine fetches and indexes what we ship.
- Week 22The question listBuild the list from what engines actually search, plus what your counsellors, admissions team and Search Console hear from students and parents.
- Week 23Pick the first ringYou choose one group of questions, such as one program's shortlist questions before the next intake. We register predictions and set control questions we never touch.
- Weeks 3 to 64Build and verifyAnswer-shaped program pages, outcome data by cohort and accurate third-party profiles, each verified live, indexed and fetched by the engines.
- Day 30, 45 and 605Measure and publishRetrieval check on day 30, first citations on day 45, a verdict against the controls on day 60. You get the result in writing either way.
Proof the method works.
Newton School's Google AI mention rate rose from 51.4% to 93.3% (full-run averages, 20 to 25 May vs 8 to 10 Jun 2026), and it held #1 in its category in every monitored run. The anonymised upskilling study is the counter-case: ranking first on Google did not make it the AI answer.
We do the work. You approve three things.
AirPulse agents and strategists
- Run daily measurement across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI, with control questions
- Draft program pages, outcome pages and markup from your own data
- Verify each change is live, indexed and cited, and report against the controls
Your team
- 1Topic
- 2Content
- 3Publish
EdTech, by segment
Questions teams ask first.
Make your outcomes the answer
Approve the process, and we pick the first ring of questions with you in week two.

