AIRPULSE VS EVERTUNE · COMPARISON · JUNE 2026

AirPulse vs Evertune: measurement at scale, or fixes you can verify?

Evertune runs the biggest prompt samples in the category, a statistician's approach to AI brand perception. AirPulse is an operator's approach. The right pick depends on which question you're asking.

Pick Evertune when…

✓You need statistically robust brand measurement: 1M+ prompts per brand per month, plus EverPanel's 150M+ real-user prompt panel.
✓You're an enterprise brand or agency holdco: Evertune's WPP channel makes it a natural fit inside big-agency stacks.
✓Your question is “how does AI perceive my brand?” at index level, with unlimited competitor tracking.

Pick AirPulse when…

✓Your question is “which exact answers and sources do we fix first?”, prompt-level detail over aggregate indices.
✓The reported ~$3,000/month annual floor (third-party, as of June 2026) is steep for your stage.
✓You want crawler analytics, GSC grounding and shipped remediation, not measurement alone.
Side by side

AirPulse and Evertune, feature by feature

EvertuneAirPulse
Engines monitored9 incl. Meta AI and DeepSeek: ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, CopilotChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot
Monitoring depthAI Brand Index at 1M+ prompts/brand/month; SOV, sentiment, unlimited competitors; EverPanel real-user prompt panelDaily prompt runs: citation sightings, source mix, sentiment, category rank
Crawler / agent analyticsNo crawler-log/agent analytics beyond a GEO site auditAgent Pulse: crawler & agent log analytics, tied to remediation
Content executionContent activation, plus Strength & Opportunity URLsContent Pulse: schema-aware authoring
Done-with-you remediationNo done-for-you implementationYes: done with you, verified by live re-audits on production
GSC / analytics integrationNo revenue attributionGSC integration; control-brand analysis on your own analytics
Evidence standardScale itself: largest prompt samples in category; Athenahealth, Roku, Virgin Voyages, Canada Goose, MiroPublished methodology: control groups, consistent windows, live-verified audits
Pricing transparencyUndisclosed/demo-gated; reported ~$3,000/mo on annual terms (third-party, as of June 2026)Engagement-based, scoped with you up front
Best fitEnterprise brands + agency holdcos (WPP)Mid-market B2B that wants fixes shipped
What actually separates us

The differences that survive a demo call

The statistician and the operator

Evertune's bet is that sample size beats everything: at a million-plus prompts per brand per month, its AI Brand Index has confidence intervals nobody polling a few hundred prompts can match, and EverPanel adds real-user behavior most vendors only simulate. If you're a CMO defending brand health to a board, that rigor is the product. AirPulse polls far fewer prompts, deliberately, because our unit of work isn't the index, it's the individual answer: which engine, which source, what it said, and which fix changes it.

Aggregates don't ship fixes

Evertune's gaps are the operator's checklist: no crawler-log or agent analytics beyond a site audit, no revenue attribution, no done-for-you implementation, and an orientation toward aggregate scores over prompt-level detail. AirPulse's whole loop lives in that gap: Agent Pulse reads crawler behavior, Content Pulse drafts the schema-aware fix, our team ships it with yours, and a live re-audit confirms it landed. Newton School's Google AI mention rate went from 51.4% to 93.3% on full-run windows because five specific fixes shipped on five specific dates, that causality chain is what small-sample, high-touch measurement buys.

Proof

Numbers with dates on them

✓Newton School: Google AI mention rate 51.4% → 93.3% (May 20–25 vs Jun 8–10 full-run windows), category #1 in every single run.
✓AirPulse on itself: branded clicks +235% while a control brand declined 14% over the same window. We ran the placebo test on our own numbers.
FAQ

Questions teams ask on this comparison

Scale. Evertune samples over a million prompts per brand per month, the largest in the category, and its EverPanel draws on a 150M+ real-user prompt panel. It raised a $15M Series A in August 2025 ($20M total) and works with brands like Roku, Virgin Voyages and Miro.

Pricing is undisclosed and demo-gated. Third-party sources report roughly $3,000/month on annual terms, about a $36K/year floor, as of June 2026; treat that as reported, not quoted.

Evertune offers content activation and identifies strength and opportunity URLs, but there's no done-for-you implementation and no crawler-log/agent analytics beyond a site audit. Execution stays with your team or your agency.

Different instrument for a different job. Index-grade measurement needs massive samples; remediation needs depth per answer, engine, source, phrasing, and the fix. We publish our methodology (consistent windows, control brands, live-verified audits) so the smaller sample is auditable rather than asserted.

← All comparisons

Want the answer-level detail an index can't give you?

A walkthrough on your own brand's prompts, run by the team that builds the product.